Get in Touch with BOSHIYA
Technical Service and Technical Support for Industrial Operations
We keep factories running. IIoT deployment, automation integration, cloud architecture, predictive maintenance — and a support team that actually picks up the phone. BOSHIYA Group brings 100+ years of industrial know-how to every engagement.
Request a Consultation
Technical Service Capabilities
Industrial IoT Deployment
Automation & Controls Integration
Cloud Architecture for Manufacturing
AI & Data Analytics
Managed Tech Support (L1–L3)
OT/IT Convergence Consulting
Technical Support Tiers
Response Capacity and SLA Commitments
| Parameter | L1 — Front Line | L2 — Advanced | L3 — Engineering |
| Response Time (P1) | 15 min acknowledge | 30 min engage | 2 hr on-site/remote |
| Coverage | 24/7/365 | 24/7/365 | Business hrs + on-call |
| Team Size per Client | 4-8 agents | 2-4 specialists | 1-2 engineers |
| Typical Resolution | Known-fix runbooks | Cross-system diagnostics | Code/architecture changes |
| Escalation Trigger | > 30 min unresolved | > 2 hr or safety-critical | Root-cause / design flaw |
| Tools | Ticketing, KB articles | Log analysis, network traces | Code repos, firmware labs |
| Monthly Ticket Volume | ~2,400 avg | ~750 avg | ~250 avg |
Wholesale Technical Support & Outsourcing Models for Enterprise
You probably already know this if you’re on this page — finding and keeping qualified support specialists is brutal right now.
- L1 front-line — your people, your brand voice, your plant knowledge.
- Quality standards and escalation policies.
- Vendor relationship ownership.
- Final sign-off on any architecture changes.
- L2/L3 surge capacity.
- After-hours and weekend coverage.
- Niche expertise (ICS security, IIoT analytics, legacy system migration).
- Quarterly audits and continuous improvement reporting.
Real Technical Problems
And How We Actually Fix Them
A midsized refinery in Texas was losing about 38 hours of unplanned downtime per month across three process units. We installed vibration and temperature sensors on 140 rotating assets — pumps, compressors, blowers — and connected them to an edge analytics stack running on-premises (they didn’t want data leaving their network, which we respected).
Took us 11 weeks to deploy and tune the models. Honestly, the first month was rough — we got a flood of false positives because the baseline data was noisy. Had to recalibrate thresholds on about 30% of the sensors. But by month three, the system caught a bearing degradation on a critical feed pump 62 hours before failure. That single save? Worth about $340,000 in avoided production loss and emergency repair costs.
After 8 months, unplanned downtime dropped to 11 hours/month. Not zero — that’s unrealistic in a facility built in 1988 — but a 71% reduction that the operations VP could actually put in front of the board.
A structural steel plant outside Cleveland had seven different control systems across their melt shop, rolling mill, and finishing lines. Some of the equipment had serial interfaces — no Ethernet at all. Their IT team tried twice to build a unified dashboard and gave up both times.
We came in, mapped every communication pathway (took about two weeks, and yeah, some of the documentation was… let’s say “creative”), and installed 23 OPC UA gateways with edge computing nodes. The tricky part was the melt shop — the electromagnetic interference from the arc furnaces kept corrupting data packets. We ended up running fiber-optic backbone through that section instead of copper. Problem solved.
Whole project: 14 weeks. Result: real-time visibility across all seven systems on a single web-based dashboard. The plant manager told us he could finally see his entire operation from his desk instead of walking the floor with a radio — which, to be fair, he still does. Old habits.
A food and beverage company with four plants across the Southeast was burning through contract technicians. High turnover, inconsistent quality, and — this was the real kicker — every time a contractor left, the tribal knowledge walked out with them. No documentation, no runbooks, just gone.
We took over L2 and L3 support for all four sites. Built a knowledge base from scratch (painful but necessary — about 400 articles covering everything from “how to reset the palletizer after a jam” to “what to do when the batching system throws error code 7042”). Assigned dedicated specialists who learned each plant’s quirks over the first 90 days.
Twelve months in: average ticket resolution time dropped from 6.4 hours to 2.1 hours. Contractor spend fell by about 40%. And the knowledge base — that’s theirs now. Even if we parted ways tomorrow, the documentation stays.
A specialty chemical company needed IEC 62443 compliance for a new contract with a major pharma client. Their OT network was… flat. Everything on one subnet. PLCs, HMIs, the building HVAC, even the break room coffee machine (It was IoT-enabled and sitting on the same VLAN as the reactor controls).
We did a full network assessment, segmented into security zones and conduits per IEC 62443-3-3, deployed industrial firewalls at zone boundaries, and built monitoring dashboards for anomalous traffic patterns. Four months of work. The coffee machine got its own guest network — we insisted.
They passed the compliance audit on the first attempt and landed the pharma contract. Worth about $4.2 million annually to their business.
Technical Service Planning Tools
Unplanned Downtime Cost Calculator
Your Plant Parameters
Cost Analysis
and click Calculate

![ASME Pressure Vessel Fabrication Guide: Section VIII Requirements [2025]](https://boshiya.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2-46-150x150.webp)


